In this IMS Critical Analysis Session, the presenter examines a discussion between Yasir Qadhi and Haitam al-Haddad—not to take sides, but to identify logical fallacies, biases, and inconsistencies in their arguments. ????????????
This session is designed to help students:
- Recognize where emotional reasoning replaces solid evidence
- Spot logical fallacies hidden within scholarly debates
- Understand how perspective, context, and bias shape interpretations
- Strengthen their ability to critically analyze content rather than passively consume it
- Build a more structured and objective approach to studying sensitive theological topics
A powerful exercise that trains the mind to separate arguments from authority, ensuring that analysis remains rooted in clarity, fairness, and intellectual discipline.
Recent Comments